Lewis O'Malley-Scott is like any other 16-year-old school kid. He attends regularly, does his best in class, and like most teens, he's no saint but he's not a problematic pupil either.
He wears his $400 uniform neatly, but his appearance has become a point of contention at King's High School in Dunedin.
"The first time I found out it was an issue is when I was going to change subjects and I had to go speak to the Year 12 dean and he told me, before I could even ask about swapping subjects, how my hair was deemed as an extreme haircut," Lewis said.
The offending style was no unnaturally-coloured spiked mohawk, nor did it feature offensive symbology shaved into the side of his head. Instead, the haircut in question was cornrows.
"I thought he told me to just undo one of my cornrows that was different to how the rest of the style was because they were all uniform going backwards except one was going to the side.
"So I fixed the one that was going off to the side and made them all the same, and then I came back to school the next day and he said I had to completely undo all my cornrows."
Lewis is of African-American descent and his hair naturally forms an afro.
He works part time at a fast food restaurant, and his family thought the hairstyle would satisfy the hygiene needs of his job and end any friction with the school.
It was also the same hairstyle he wore when he started at the high school four years ago and it did not cause any problems at that point.
His mother, Michelle O'Malley-Scott, fully supported her son - in fact, she was the one who put four hours into crafting the cornrows. She could not understand what the fuss was about and said the school had been dismissive in its attitude.
"He needs to be able to just relax in class and do his work," she said.
"He doesn't need to be bothered with an afro that may or may not get in his eyes, or he gets too overheated with his afro in the classroom. He needed to just be able to have his cornrows and do his work which is what he wants to do. He's not the type of person that stirs up a classroom, he just does his work."
His father, Nathaniel Scott Jr, said he believed it was more about control than hair.
"His work required him to have it that way so he can wear it comfortably at work. It fits in at school, so what was the big problem? The issue is, basically, asserting authority," Scott said.
"We understand there are a range of views on what is appropriate school uniform wearing," the statement said.
"Last week the student in question was invited to discuss the matter with his parents so we could reach an understanding. A number of options were discussed and it was decided that he would remove the braids and return to open and un-patterned hair. The individual style he achieved enabled him to fit the school uniform policy while retaining his individuality.
"This policy provides good common ground on which students from many different backgrounds can enjoy inclusion and recognition."
King's uniform policy is relatively ambiguous, stating: "Hair must be their natural colour with non-extreme cuts. If hair falls below the collar it must be tied back."
Lewis said some of the haircuts among his peers could be viewed as more extreme than what he sported.
"Like half the school is walking around with mullets and people are walking around with hair down past their neck. Then mine is ... different, but it's tidy," the teenager said.
That seemed to be the biggest sticking point. "Extreme" could mean many things and was open to interpretation but it essentially it boiled down to something outside the norm.
His sister, Ori O'Malley-Scott said King's interpretation of extreme ignored her brother's heritage and culture, and that was why she spoke out on social media.
"It's not extreme - it's our culture," she said.
"There's a difference between a buzz cut, which is seen as used by neo-Nazis, and cornrows which are cultural and indigenous to African people which is what we are - we are African-American and we are just trying to appreciate our culture."
Ministry of Education sector enablement and support deputy secretary Katrina Casey said schools could have sway over a student's hairstyle.
"School boards have the authority to make and apply school rules on a wide range of matters such as uniforms and appearance, which can include hairstyles," she said.
"We don't require schools to inform us about their rules, however, we do expect them to communicate the school rules clearly to parents and caregivers and to consult them if they are proposing any changes.
"Schools are generally very clear about their expectations and rules and are very happy to explain them and respond to any questions or queries parents might have. School boards also develop a formal complaints process for parents to follow when they have issues with what has occurred at school. If parents remain concerned after that process, they can contact our local office for advice."
The ministry did not address questions about what cultural considerations were expected of schools and whether an ambiguous policy referring to extreme hairstyles could be unfairly applied to children who were not Pākehā.
The Lewis family said just as Parliament had taken heed of Rawiri Waititi's objection to wearing a tie, schools should also think about how inclusive and culturally appropriate their uniform expectations were.
Comments
I guess this particular school's off our list now. Shame. Too much pride of the wrong kind.
Seriously? There is only one head that needs attending to here and its on the shoulders of the rector.
So Kings complains about his natural hair, and then complain when he controls his natural hair. This reflects WAY worse on the school than the student with cornrows. If it looks, sounds, and smells like racism ... odds are ...
Another clown in Dunedin in authority, as an Ex Kings High School Student in the mid to late 80's, I hate to say the attitudes haven't changed much, I apologise for his behaviour. Where is the education department weighing in on this? It is not the first time that this rector has stepped out of line in the and been in media. To the Scott family stand proud for speaking up your ancestors would be proud as a lot of others are. McIvor where is your public apology to this family, stand down McIvor your job is finished, shame on you.
If you know your history,
Then you would know where you coming from...
https://daily.jstor.org/how-natural-black-hair-at-work-became-a-civil-ri...
I would never, ever send any son of mine to a boys school. With rare exceptions, they are hotbeds of misogyny, racism and everything that is wrong with the male psyche in this country. And I speak as both a New Zealand male and a former pupil of King's High School. "Building Men for Life", the school's recently adopted marketing catchphrase, sounds good but what does it really mean? What the school is doing to this young man is a disgrace. There are clearly established cultural reasons for this hairstyle and it is far from being an "extreme" hairstyle anyway. This is a classic case of racist bullying and a person in authority lacking the ability to admit that they are wrong. Is that what is meant by "Building Men for Life"? Surely there is a case here for the Human Rights Commission to investigate? Or for the Race Relations Commissioner to comment on? Or....for the school and its leadership to stop making itself look silly and do the right thing?
Why doesn't the school simply refuse to accept students with the wrong kind of hair? You know - African kind of hair. They don't accept it when it grows naturally, they don't accept it when it is controlled to be as close to the head as white people's hair. Those people's skin colour tends to be a colour that isn''t an standard colour with the uniform, but they're not allowed to discriminate about race so hair may be a permissable excuse. If not barring the "wrong-looking" kids in the first place, make the school so uncomfortable for them that they leave early or transfer to a school that concentrates on the essentials of learning and turning out young adults our society can be proud of.
I think most of us can see what the underlying issue is at Kings - no matter how clean, tidy., well-behaved and hard-working at their studies it's presenting a "uniform" appearance that matters, an appearance designed originally for white kids and unwilling to catch up with 2021 standards of what's socially acceptable in NZ.