Comment permalink

The doctor carried out the mercy killing with the consent and support of the woman's family....
Photo: files
Promoting euthanasia is dangerous, lazy and stupid, Sarah McGill writes.

The end of life choice Bill has been passed. Sixty-two percent of voters believe it offers ‘‘choice’’ at the end of life. They don’t see any chance of it being abused, of fatal mistakes being made. They can’t imagine a ‘‘useless’’ member of society (a society which judges the value of people based on their economic productivity for goodness sake!) feeling pressure to move aside. Can’t imagine losing a whole generation of people before their time.

All I can share is my own experience. My lovely mother was a robust and resilient woman who lived a somewhat charmed life. She emigrated from the UK in 1957 with her husband, worked as a doctor, raised five children; she was beautiful, successful, intelligent and capable. She was also a fierce and fervent promoter of ‘‘progressive’’ causes such as abortion on demand, euthanasia etc.

As 65 she lived alone in a pretty little house, with a beautiful, huge garden that absorbed her fully. She asked me to euthanise her as soon as she could no longer manage the house (with the caveat that I should not do it if it meant I would go to prison for murder). That time came soon enough and at 78 she was shipped off to a daughter in Auckland for a year or so, before landing in a rest-home near me, with dementia but fairly good physical health.

God, she was annoying at times; irritating and lovely in equal measure. Without responsibility, she was soft, kind and so, so grateful. We had some lovely times and I was able to show my own daughter how I would like to be cared for. She was contented and certainly didn’t mention euthanasia any more.

The end drew near. Her body started to pack up and I went through the miserable cycle known to many; powerless over her deterioration, upset with family members who were critical of my efforts, getting used to a ‘‘new normal’’ every few months; drudgery, weariness, grief and fear. There would be a little money after she died, but not enough to want her gone.

On many days I just wanted it to be over because I was so tired of it. Other days I appreciated wonderful moments; the funny, funny things said in her delirium, falling asleep in her arms, remarkable conversations about her impending death, amends made from both sides.

And then, in the final few months, an incredible miracle. My father, terrified, exhausted and blind arrived at the rest-home shortly after his second wife died. (You may well end up in the same rest-home as someone you raised children with, divorced or not).

With much amusement, we all soon realised my parents had forgotten they were divorced. Their old brains were so worn out and broken. But love doesn’t live in the brain, it lives in the heart and a love that started at 17 isn’t forgotten. When they realised, my gallant old father proposed again and a marriage licence was arranged.

I’ll never forget the beautiful women from the DIA who came to interview these two spent human beings on their fitness for marriage. We were all so moved that their love for each other was the last thing left of them.

The wedding didn’t go ahead, my mother died a few weeks later, but in her heart and in what was left of her mind, she was married again to the man she had loved for 70 years. She spent her last day sitting in the sunshine holding his hand and then, aged 86, she left us to go and stand on a mountaintop with the wind lifting her hair.

Her last words to me seemed inconsequential at the time, a question that indicated she no longer knew me, but three years on it makes sense.

Our father died six months later. I was his welfare guardian and I had little trouble making the decisions to withhold further medical intervention after it had gone far enough. But no, I didn’t want it hurried up. I wanted him to have every possible moment he could hold on for. He waited for his son to arrive and then he died in his sleep early the next morning.

There is no doubt that those long difficult months were some of the richest and most profound of my life so far. But I didn’t recognise it at the time and who knows what I would have done had euthanasia been legal? Would I have unconsciously or even consciously pressured them into it? Could my muddled mind or those of my parents have been tempted by the possibility of getting it all over and done with more quickly?

I don’t know and I’m just so grateful that society protected me from this temptation.

Laws that result in or promote ending human life are dangerous, lazy and stupid. The worst-case scenarios will happen and death is irreversible.

I don’t think any of the supporters of euthanasia would find it so flash if their own 18-year-old child is put to sleep after receiving a diagnosis of terminal illness. I know my mother found abortion on demand lost its shine when her own potential grandchildren ended up in the autoclave at the abortion clinic.

It’s a shame to tell my mother’s beautiful story in the context of opposing a law, but if it convinces even one person to create a binding declaration to opt out of euthanasia, a declaration that cannot be overridden under any circumstances, then my job is done.

This is my declaration.

  • Sarah McGill lives in Queenstown.

 

Comments

View all

Your story is heart warming and certainly thought provoking, yet it does nothing to demonstrate all the fears you have of the freedom of choice system being abused or of mistakes happening. Let's face it, the chances of someone dying through error or accident under the new system is no dfferent than it was under the old. Drs have been killing dozens of NZers each year by way of accidents and negligence. The new system won't affect that in the slightest.
I am very happy that the necessary checks and balances are in place to manage the risks and if gaps or loopholes are discovered I am confident they will be fixed quickly.
The referendum has resulted in NZ becoming a better, more liberal society. Long may it continue.

You can't gainsay the personal experience of the author.

The Bill was toned down by Seymour to get it through.
He has a misguided public mandate to make it wider.

An odd concept of Liberal. May it not long continue.

I did not deny the personal experience of the author. I simply stated my opinion that her article did not provide any evidence to back up her suggestion that the new "choice" system would be abused. I stand by that.
My concept of liberal is in line with all of the experts on the topic. The key component of liberalism is personal freedom, look it up.
This new law improves freedom, gives individuals the right to chose their own fate. You can't get more liberal than that. Long may it endure.

Look at the ACC if you have any experience but if not read the reports. There are sufficient "bad" doctors to support ACC denial of claims later found valid claims. There is elder abuse now - why will this go euthanize yourself pressure not be added to the abuse? I enjoyed this story - it is the story of life - you never know when magic moments and joy can be found.

The nay sayers have predicted armeggedon after every significant social change that has happened in NZ. Homosexual law reform: the naysayers were predicting that our sons would be seduced to homosexuality if that was approved, didn't happen. Decriminalisation of prostitution: there would be prostitutes on every street corner, never happened. Same sex marriage: would destroy the institution of marriage: never happened. It will be the same with the freedom of choice over end of life.
In the case of cannabis the naysayers won. They predicted all sorts of disasters. All that will happen now is that the gangs will continue their criminal domination of the recreational drug industry and destroy more lives than ever.

Medico legal is not Social Change within your terms. The legislation is murky.
What power have Welfare Guardians in decisions?
Is the 'choice' irrevocable?
Is a patient chatting in the day room still down for procedure?
Will there be consequences for doctors who refuse termination procedure?

Don't tell me to look things up, bud. I've been whacked in the street for Liberal causes. Not 'open slather' libertarianism, just human rights. Ow.

Anti victimology asserts that criminals don't have such power. They will continue to be busted, by police.

...according to you.

I always thought those promoting euthanasia should perhaps try it first and see if they then wanted to change their minds. In reality suicide is not illegal. The only thing this act does is require medical staff, who have trained to save lives, be part of a system to end life. The way this sort of law is usually interpreted is that they will find it hard to refuse, just like celebrants who do not agree with same sex marriage have been forced to comply. Never trust a politician to keep their word.

In response to the comments by David on Wed 11/11/2020.
No one is being forced to do anything against their will. Marriage celebrants who oppose same sex marriage are free to refuse to perform such ceremonies.
The thing is, most of those who do abandon their high moral values once they realize the exorbitant fees they can charge to provide their services. The free market is a very liberating force.
The same will apply to Dr's

View all