Cruise ban will cause Dunedin 'pain'

Photo: Stephen Jaquiery
Photo: Stephen Jaquiery
Dunedin Mayor Aaron Hawkins is backing Government moves to protect New Zealanders from the coronavirus pandemic, and is keen to focus more on domestic tourism.

"The measures announced by the Prime Minister are significant, but so is the risk posed by a global pandemic," Mr Hawkins said today.

"Public health has to be our priority right now, and we owe this to our older and more vulnerable residents in particular.

"The bulk of this year’s cruise ship schedule has been and gone, but this still means the cancellation of a dozen boats still due to visit over the next month.

"On top of this, mandatory self-isolation for fourteen days will likely result in fewer international visitors arriving by plane.

This would have "a negative impact on local tour operators and the wider tourism and business sector".

Approached for comment about the economic impact of the Government moves, Mr Hawkins said the DCC was "trying to help mitigate those impacts by focusing more on domestic tourism, as fewer New Zealanders will be travelling overseas in the near future.

"I wouldn’t want to hazard a guess as to the total economic impact in the short term, but the implications of community transmission are far more significant— for our economy and for our public health system.

"I look forward to seeing what the Prime Minister announces on Tuesday in terms of support for affected workers and businesses.

"As always, we’d be happy to offer our support in terms of developing options that best suit our local situation," Mr Hawkins said. 

A Government move to halt cruise ship visits to New Zealand ports because of coronavirus concerns will cause Dunedin economic pain, but is the right thing to do, Dunedin City Councillor Sophie Barker says.

She is the Otago Peninsula Trust marketing manager and previously served as a Dunedin City Council tourism development adviser, working closely with the cruise industry.

Ms Barker said the Government move would cause "pain" and mean significant loss of income, but most of the cruise ship season was over, and perhaps only about 10% of the anticipated further income remained.

"While I am shocked and upset for everyone in the visitor industry by the effect Covid 19 is having on our industry I think we all agree the most important thing is people.

"As we are reminded by the Maori he tangata saying.

"He aha te mea nui o te ao. He tangata, he tangata, he tangata ("What is the most important thing in the world? It is people, it is people, it is people.")

Much greater pain would result in coronavirus entered New Zealand and took the lives of vulnerable people, she warned.

"All of us have people we love and want to protect and we all need to work together for the best outcomes of this horrible situation," she said.

"We have to take the right moral decision," she added.

"It’s[the virus outbreak] shocking for the world.

The potential risk to older people in a hospital system overloaded by coronavirus was ultimately more important to avoid than "a little bit of money" in the tourism industry.

New Zealand had to make sure that "our own people" were also protected and that our health system was supported to protect us by keeping the virus out.

She accepted the Government had made a decision to protect New Zealanders, and at-risk people from the Pacific Islands.

"We have to take the most responsible decision for New Zealand.

A strong package of measures is needed from Government to overcome the growing disruption of business, including from coronavirus issues, Dougal McGowan says.

Mr McGowan, who is Otago Chamber of Commerce chief executive said moves to stop cruise ship visits, including to Dunedin, would clearly result in significant lost income for some businesses.

However, he supported that step to keep Covid-19 out.

‘‘We’ve got to try to contain it as much as we possibly can,’’ he said in an interview.

‘‘If we can do that we’ve been hugely successful.’’

Enterprise Dunedin would be able to give a more accurate estimate of the economic costs to the city of the cruise ship move.

And the introduction of mandatory self-isolation for visitors arriving from abroad, other than from Pacific nations, would also add to business disruption.

Requirements for self isolation after air travel to New Zealand from overseas countries, except for Pacific Island nations, would prove disruptive for business, given the importance of trans-Tasman links for tourism and business.

There would be a ‘‘massive impact’’ on tourism and other business activity.

Further problems would emerge if people were no longer able to travel to do deals as they had traditionally, he said.

Governments in the UK, Australia and the United States had recently been prepared to spend big money in dealing with related issues.

The Government’s Regional Business Partner initiative was positive and there had been a ‘‘really good response’’ to it, but much more was now needed to protect firms and the jobs they provided.

Government could consider replacing planned minimum wage increases with tax breaks to stimulate spending by workers while reducing the burden on business, he said.

The Government plans to announce further economic measures next Tuesday.


 

 

Comments

View all

Succinctly put and totally agree! Well said Sophie.

How can Hawkins not back a decission made by the PM?, I guess it doesn't go against the Local and regional governments and ICLEI that he is on a committee for and when it is steering and shaping Dunedin Via Hawkins Mayorship. How can Hawkins even say this with a straight face, 'we owe this to our older and more vulnerable residents in particular.' When he will not listen about parking, closing of roads the Octagon and expecting the older generation to cycle walk and doesn't give a ..... about them at other times. I guess its Grandstanding getting amongst it.

Spot on.

Cruise ship ban won't cause as much pain to Dunedin as this virus getting hold. We have had drills about Earthquakes and Tsunamis along with the experience of such events so I guess this is also a new scenario that will shape how we plan for future events like this and learn how best to limit the damage when the next similar health threat approaches.

Infectious disease experts globally have stated that we should keep calm and carry on. The world health organisation says we have a Pandemic. Our PM virtually shuts our borders imposing the heaviest restrictions in the world. So now, get ready for the 'real' fall out. After and during the initial 'panic' there will be huge job losses, people will soon struggle to pay mortgages, rent and food bills. Do you think for one moment the government will reinburse you all for you losses? Do they intend suing the Chinese government for losses? This started in Wuhan afterall.
This Convid-19 virus is another flu, and should be treated as such. The numbers of infected and deaths are far below what we see annually around the world. Yet, we have infectious disease experts saying we shouldn't panic. Who do we believe? How deep do we allow a recession to go? Are we going to go through this everytime a new flu is declared? More Insurance needed? 'Sars' 'Swine', all flu's. Are we over-reacting? I guess time will tell and the NZ public are going to be the isolation experiment.....while many will face immense financial hardship. Some clear facts are needed, in place of knee jerk reactive statements.

Don't look to the mayor or the council for leadership in an emergency like this. They all lack the knowledge, experience and common sense to provide adequate support to the people of Dunedin. Just like nobody on council has any experience running a business, nobody in DCC has any experience with disasters. Look at the CV for everybody in the DCC emergency management office. Not one person has any experience with a real disaster. The acting chief is the former communications manager. These are people going through the motions. Done expect competent assistance from any of these clowns. Make your own emergency survival plan, focus on your family and neighbours first. Do not make the mistake of expecting the DCC to provide support to you in an emergency. The burden is on you to take care of yourself. This is what happens when people don't take elections seriously.

Good comment. My only wish would be that people see things for what they actually are....however there seems to be more sheeple than people. In an age when we have so much information at our finger tips, all we do is play games and send pics of our meals and genitals.......what a waste of expensive and very helpful technology.

I've asked for the Ban and i got one thank you Jacinda

With respect to you Peeppoo. do some research, our health officials and those who advise our PM have let us down. Testing rather than banning would have kept our economy turning over. In fact, we could have set a standard for global travel.......with a simple swab test. We are in an ideal position to 'lead' rather than 'follow' simply due to our isolation on the globe. Our officials have dropped the ball on this. But no, we've rolled out the bubblewrap and implemented 'nanny state' thinking. As a society, we could use technology to increase our knowledge....or, we could send a pic of our dinner. Sadly, many won't read this, just send a pic of their dinner....

There was life before cruise ships.

Quote- "A Government move to halt cruise ship visits to New Zealand ports because of coronavirus concerns will cause Dunedin economic pain, but is the right thing to do, Dunedin City Councillor Sophie Barker says."
Yet our government could well of demanded that cruise ship companies screen ALL passengers and crew with a simple swab test long before they ever arrived here. At the start of the outbreak, airlines could have achieved a similar thing if they wanted to. Far cheaper than closing economies and borders. What a mess. Now we pay the economic price. The WHO implemented swab testing some time ago as general protocol. Yet travellers and tourists remained untested and now we have border lock downs. Love your work officials! Oh, but you will all still have a job and pay your mortgages. Solutions were there, so simple. This isn't Ebola with a 30% fatality rate, nor the 1819 flu epidemic with a 50% mortality rate. Why the inaction and over reaction? I'm gobsmacked at the inability of so called policy makers.
And not once have I heard of 'recovery rates'. The media aren't reporting in a balanced way, just sensationalizing and sowing the seed of fear. Disgraceful.....

View all

 

Advertisement