![Lucy Telfar
Barnard](https://www.odt.co.nz/sites/default/files/styles/odt_portrait_medium_3_4/public/story/2021/02/lucy_telfar_barnard.jpg?itok=IwtfYYEG)
Information released by Statistics New Zealand (Stats NZ) yesterday showed Auckland and Wellington incomes — after housing costs — had increased, but nowhere else had they gained enough to make a significant difference, University of Otago, Wellington senior research fellow Lucy Telfar Barnard said.
Income was tracking vaguely in the right direction in Otago and Southland at the time of the lockdown.
But due to rising housing costs, quality of life was no better before the pandemic, Dr Telfar Barnard said.
The average annual household adjusted income — after housing costs — was $36,064 for Otago compared with $33,567 in 2018-19.
And further south, it crept from $35,436 in 2018-19 in Southland to $37,858 in 2020 before Covid-19 hit.
"The affordability crisis in Otago continues," Dr Telfar Barnard said yesterday.
"We don’t know yet, we can’t tell from this data, what effect Covid had on any of this.
"And we do know that house prices have continued to soar through the pandemic."
Housing before the pandemic remained unaffordable for many New Zealanders.
In March 2020, 26.5% of people who did not own their own homes were spending an unaffordable amount of their income — more than 40% — on housing.
For homeowners, though, that number was only 11.6%.
The data in yesterday’s release did not reflect how Covid-19 affected household incomes, housing costs or material wellbeing because the data covered a period before lockdown.
Nevertheless, in the year before the lockdown hit, for every $100 a household spent on average, $21 was spent on housing costs, about the same as 2019, Stats NZ said.
At the same time the measure it used for inequality was more or less unchanged from 2019, it said.
Comments
I'd be very interested to hear which sectors had such a great pay increase. I know mine didn't move at all.
This is interesting to me. I did a few calculations on what my first house cost me back in 1972 and compared to today.
My wife and I built our first home, a small, basic, 3 bedroom home for $8000, my annual income at the time was $2000 per annum. Basically the house cost us 4 times my annual income. (This was before the first oil shocks!). The house was about 80sq/m in size
By my calculation you could build the same small, basic, 3 bedroom home for $160,000 (that's based on a cost of $2000 per sq/m). That is 4 times an annual salary of $40000, which as I understand it is below the current average wage.
My point is, the relative cost of building has remained fairly static.
My question is why do people find it so difficult to get a new home?