

US not furthering concord
The major portion of the message inaugurating President Coolidge’s fresh term of office bears relation to matters in which the League of Nations is directly concerned. The address appears to be marked by that touch of generous platitude which is rather too characteristic of the set deliverances of American statesmen. Moreover, traces of the pressure of party exigency are distinctly noticeable. Mr Coolidge, inheriting the Harding policy, feels bound to steer clear of the Wilson tradition. The advocacy of the principle of the League of Nations has been annexed, so to speak, by the Democrats. Therefore the Republicans, following the vicious line of faction, are constrained to oppose it, or at least to express their not wholly dissimilar views in dissimilar terms. There is a remarkable canniness, not to say pawkiness, in President Coolidge’s treatment of world affairs. In one sentence he seems to emphasise the Monroe shibboleth in the strictest way; in another he envisages wide views of American obligation in regard to external developments. "We cannot live unto ourselves alone" is the keynote of the address; but the note is not consistently maintained. Indeed, following upon this edifying text, there appears to be a pointed suggestion that the American people would be well-advised to live unto themselves alone, so far as is compatible with decent self-respect. The President recognises that the United States government has committed itself in various ways to participation in European affairs. "We have," he says, "made a great contribution to the settlement of contentious differences in both Europe and Asia." But he does not seem to realise all that was involved in the engagement by the United States in the Great War. Perhaps if he or his predecessor had been in office in 1917 the engagement, so slowly reached, would never have eventuated. Mr Woodrow Wilson, with all his hesitancies and pedantries, finally did his duty in the cause of civilisation and humanity. The fact is that the curse of party politics lies with malign heaviness on the spirit of American international enterprise. It is reasonable to expect that insidious catchwords like "detachment" and "independence" will lose their force at no distant date; but in the meantime America is not exercising a tithe of its possible influence in furthering the permanent establishment of concord among the nations. — editorial — ODT, 6.3.1925
Compiled by Peter Dowden