Z Energy second-half trading boosts result

Fuel retailer Z Energy has posted improved second-half trading to boost its full-year result.

Margins were up on fuel, refining and non-fuel concession sales.

However, Z Energy's statutory balance sheet reported a 9% decline in revenue, from $3.37billion the previous year $3.06billion for its year to March.

Statutory operating earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, amortisation and financial instruments (ebitdaf) fell 60% from $208 million last year to $83million this year, while its after tax profit plunged 93%, from $95million to $7 million.

Increases in depreciation and amortisation, up 10% to $43 million, financing expenses up 48% to $37 million and other expenses up 40% at $7 million all undermined the bottom line. Z Energy will pay a 24.2c dividend for the year, up from 22c last year.

Its shares were down 1c to $4.99 following the announcement.

Craigs Investment Partners broker Peter McIntyre said the underlying fuel contribution was up 6% on the the previous year, as the net margin forZ Energy increased from 18cper litre to 19.3c.

''The second-half gross refining margin rebate [from Z's 17.14% share in New Zealand Refining] increased from $7 million to $24million,'' Mr McIntyre said.

The concession stores margin rose again and the non-fuel contribution was up about $4 million, at $61 million.

Guidance for the 2016 financial year was for replacement cost, operating ebitdaf of between $245 million and $265million, supported by capital investment of between $70million and $90 million, he said.

''We expected a little more from the dividend, as the current policy remains unchanged at 80% of current cost net profit after tax, which is exactly what this year's dividend implies,'' he said.

Mr McIntyre predicted a ''good outlook relative to expectations'', but the level of industry discounting since the end of the financial year ''subdues some of our enthusiasm''.

Forsyth Barr broker Suzanne Kinnaird said Z had reported a ''good result'', but not as good as expected.

Operating ebitdaf, excluding unrealised foreign exchange losses, was $243 million, about $11million lower than our forecast, but up $31 million, or 15% higher than the previous year, she said.

''The gross margin was largely in line with expectations at $537million, but operating expenses were up $9 million higher than our forecast.''

Two key areas stood out for further scrutiny: on-site expenses increased 11% to $51 million, or $4 million higher than our forecast, while administration and other expenses increased 31% to $34 million, or $6 million higher than our forecast, she said.

Ms Kinnaird said Z's guidance for full year 2016's operating ebitdaf, between $245 million and $265 million, was below Forsyth Barr's $272 million forecast, so the brokerage would be pulling back its numbers, ''predominantly due to higher operating costs''.

Add a Comment